|
Home
|
|
Symptoms
|
|
Live Discussion
|
|
Diagnosis
|
|
Treatment
|
|
World-wide Support Finder
|
|
Library
|
|
Research
|
|
Lymelinks
|
|
Contact
|
|
Pets & Lyme
|
|
DONATIONS
|
|
Drug Info
|
|
Medical Dictionary
|
|
Board of Directors
|
 
Click on the graphic to vote for this
site as a Starting Point Hot Site.
|
|
-
|
No Warranties or Representations
Lyme Disease symptoms vary from person to person. (lymes disease lyme's disease lime disease limes disease)
The data and information presented in this web site are presented in good faith and believed to be accurate regarding Lyme disease (commonly misspelled lymes disease lyme's disease lime disease limes disease) and other related diseases. Any and all liability for the content or any omissions including any inaccuracies, errors, or misstatements in such data or information is expressly disclaimed. The web site is compiled for the sole purpose of informing community members of resources and information pertaining to Lyme Borreliosis Disease and its coinfections. Lyme disease symptoms may vary from person to person.
The Canadian Lyme Disease Foundation, Directors and members are not liable for any direct or indirect damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this website.
Consult a qualified Lyme ( Borreliosis ) Disease literate doctor for medical advice if Lyme Disease is suspect to discuss your Lyme Disease Symptoms.
|
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005 Aug;12(8):910-7
Critical evaluation of urine-based PCR assay for diagnosis of lyme
borreliosis.
Rauter C, Mueller M, Diterich I, Zeller S, Hassler D, Meergans T,
Hartung T.
Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Konstanz, Fach M655, 78457
Konstanz, Germany. Thomas.Hartung@uni-konstanz.de.
Many approaches were made in recent years to establish urine PCR as
a diagnostic tool for Lyme borreliosis, but results are
contradictory. In the present study, a standardized protocol spiking
urine from healthy donors with a defined amount of whole Borrelia or
Borrelia DNA was established. The development of a nested real-time
PCR targeting ospA enabled a highly sensitive and quantitative
analysis of these samples. We show the following. (i) Storage of
spiked urine samples for up to 6 months at -20 degrees C had no
negative effect on spike recovery. (ii) Centrifugation of 10 ml of
urine at 40,000 x g for 30 min resulted in a concentration of both
spikes, i.e., whole Borrelia and DNA. (iii) The inhibition of DNA
spike recovery in 48% (11 of 23 samples) of urine samples tested
could be attributed to nuclease activity. This was abrogated by
alkalizing the urine or by working with the samples on ice. Despite
optimized conditions, analysis of urine samples of 12 patients with
erythema migrans, the clinical stage considered to be associated
with the highest bacterial load, revealed a positive result in only
one sample. All 12 samples were negative by an alternative PCR
targeting flagellin.
The results of our study support doubts that
urine is a suitable material for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.
PMID: 16085907 [PubMed - in process]
| | | |