We wish to thank
Columbia University Lyme Research Studies
group and the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS) for providing much information on this page.
These recommendations are derived from available
literature and from expert opinions.
Treatment of the bite of any tick spiecies that is a known vector for Lyme disease is practiced by many doctors who understand the seriousness of the disease...early Lyme protocol is followed. Early intervention has a very high success rate.
See also Treatment Fact and Fiction
Recent studies indicate that the blood levels attained for the chosen antibiotic vary widely from patient to patient even when the same dose is administered...this would explain some of the many treatment failures. Monitor blood levels to ensure necessary levels are reached and treat for the recommended length of time.
Criteria for selecting an antibiotic
for a given patient are clinical symptoms and signs, as well as, organ system involvement.
For example, more aggressive therapy with parenteral antibiotics is recommended for
brain involvement or heart block, while early localized disease may
respond to a course of oral therapy - 4 TO 6 WEEKS will not always eradicate disease.
The treatment of early Lyme Disease has been examined in numerous well-documented
studies. Largely because the diagnosis is easy to confirm when the erythema
migrans (bull's eye or generalized) rash is present (documented that a large percent
do not get the rash), the academic research community has focused its
efforts on the treatment of early or acute Lyme Disease. Studies
demonstrate that 4-6 weeks of oral antibiotics (doxycycline, cefuroxime,
amoxicillin) results in remission and apparent cure in most but not all cases. Several months is not uncommon and a
good outcome occurs in many only after several months.
Remember also to advise the patient of the likelihood of a
Jarisch-Herxheimer (Herx) reaction upon initiation of treatment. This is common in spirochaetal disease treatment and is caused as a result of toxins released as the die off of the spirochetes takes place.
Treatment failures have proven time and again to benefit significantly from longer term antibiotic treatment and
patients sometimes have to be very demanding to receive such treatment. In fact several states in the US have
had to enact legislation to stop the nonsense put forward by the insurance/tourism lobby that a
specific short term treatment cures Lyme disease. Studies that have been stopped at bias decided points
(trying to establish results that they want to see),
studies that have followed patients for very short time frames (when in fact longer term studies clearly
show that 'cure' was sadly mistaken) have all been debunked by less influenced
more legitimate researchers.
One has to be realistic...not being able to find something by available methods in science means nothing
to the sick patient who recovers after many weeks/months of appropriate treatment.
Once the tick-borne spirochete,
(Borrelia burgdorferi) has disseminated in the blood
stream to other areas (such as the Central Nervous System or the joints),
optimal dosing and duration of treatment is more uncertain. Although open
label clinical reports suggest that repeated antibiotic therapy may be
helpful, placebo-controlled studies of chronic Lyme disease are only now
being conducted. In chronic Lyme disease, longer courses of treatment may
result in a better long term improvement than shorter courses, but this
has yet to be tested in a randomized scientific study. Co-infection with
other tick-borne organisms, such as Babesia microti, may contribute to
some of the persistent Lyme-like symptoms.
Manifestations of Lyme carditis include atrioventricular block, myopericarditis,
intraventricular conduction disturbances, bundle branch block and congestive heart failure.
Temporary cardiac pacing may be required in up to a third of cases and complete recovery
occurs in most (greater than 90%) patients.
Why is Chronic Lyme Disease
chronic?
Several factors may account for persistent symptoms. These include
low grade persistent infection which either causes damage directly or indirectly
through the inflammatory and toxic effects of an activated immune response,
permanent damage as may occur in brain injured patients, or a Lyme-triggered
autoimmune reaction.
The persistent infection hypothesis
is based on several lines of evidence. Clinical case reports and large
clinical series indicate that some patients benefit from longer and repeated
courses of antibiotic therapy. Published reports indicate that, even after
antibiotic therapy, persistence of the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi
may be demonstrated by either culture or demonstration of Bb DNA by PCR
analysis in animals and humans. The mechanisms of persistence and immune
evasion are thought to include sequestration in intracellular or other
immunologically privileged sites, antigenic variation, decreased expression
of surface antigens in vivo, capture of the host-cell's own membrane forming
a virtual immunoprotective cloak, and/or early down-regulation of the immune
response. Much evidence now exists to demonstrate that Bb can lodge intracellularly
in human endothelial cells, astrocytes, fibroblasts, and macrophages. Bb
in vitro has been shown to enter B Lymphocytes and to exit drawing with
it the outer surface membrane of the lymphocyte. Bb in vitro can modify
its shape into potentially antibiotically-protected cyst-like forms. These
findings suggest that failure to eradicate Bb completely by antibiotic
therapy may be due to intracellular localization in vivo, the selection
of resistant strains, or sequestration in sites (such as the central nervous
system) where antibiotic penetration may be less adequate.
The post-infectious inflammatory hypothesis also is supported by several lines
of evidence. For example, patients with Lyme arthritis who carry the HLA-DR4
or DR2 allele are more vulnerable to developing a chronic antibiotic-resistant
arthritis. Indirect evidence exists to support molecular mimicry as at
least one possible explanation for persistent symptoms. For example, the
flagellin protein (on the tail of the spirochete) can generate antibodies
that cross-react with myelin basic protein, thereby contributing to axonal
dysfunction. Finally, remnants of pieces of the spirochete may result in
a persistent activation of the immune system, causing the production of
interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, and nitric oxide. These cytokines
produce fatigue and malaise, two of the more prominent symptoms experienced
by patients with chronic Lyme disease.
It is reasonable to assume
that some patients suffer from persistent infection whereas others suffer
from immune-mediated post-infectious damage. Until more is known about
the factors which identify who may respond to repeated treatment and who
is unlikely to respond, clinical decisions will be based on physician preference
rather than objective data. Longer vs shorter duration placebo-controlled
antibiotic trials need to be conducted with long-term blinded follow-up
using objective markers. Until then, the optimal treatment of the patient
with chronic Lyme Disease will be unknown. At this point in medical history,
decisions about the treatment of the patient with chronic Lyme disease
need to be individually shaped by the clinician's experience, the patient's
clinical profile and history of antibiotic responsiveness, and the emerging
medical literature.
Patients with chronic neuropsychiatric Lyme Disease may benefit from adjunctive therapies that provide symptom
relief. For example, patients with an increased sensitivity to noise may
benefit from gabapentin (Neurontin) or carbamazepine (Tegretol) treatment.
The latter medicine may also be helpful to reduce skin hypersensitivity
or headaches. Patients with marked distractibility and inattention may
benefit from medicines used to treat Attention Deficit Disorder, such as
bupropion (Wellbutrin) or methylphenidate (Ritalin). Patients with prominent
fatigue may benefit from the latter medications as well.
Consultation with a Lyme literate psychiatrist
can be very helpful both to address the psychological impact of a chronic
illness as well as to address the psychiatric symptoms that may have been
triggered. Psychiatric medications such as sertraline (Zoloft), fluoxetine
(Prozac), paroxetine (Paxil), fluvoxamine (Luvox), and citalopram (Celexa)
may be helpful for patients with depressed mood or irritability. Medicines,
such as the anti-convulsants (gabapentin, valproate, carbamazepine), are
also very good mood-stabilizers and may serve to help patients with marked
mood shifts, neuropathic pain, and/or sensory hyperacuities. Other medicines,
such as amitriptyline (Elavil) or nefazadone (Serzone), may be very helpful
for sleep and for reducing pain.
Consultation with a neuropsychologist
with expertise in cognitive remediation can also be helpful. Cognitive
remediation refers to the retraining of the brain to accomplish tasks that
were previously done automatically. Cognitive strengths are used to compensate
for current weaknesses. Such approaches have been developed for patients
with persistent cognitive deficits after head injury, for example. Similar
strategies may be helpful for patients with persistent Lyme Disease. The
best places to find experienced remediation therapists would be Centers
for Brain Injury Rehabilitation.
Ongoing attention to the problem
of "deconditioning" needs to be addressed. Because patients with chronic
Lyme Disease often experience dramatic fatigue (much akin to patients with
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome), they spend much time in bed and so their muscles
lose tone over time. This can lead to an ever worsening syndrome in which
patients get tired after exercise and so avoid it. Further deconditioning
results such that even less exercise the next time leads to considerable
post-exertional fatigue. To counter this cycle, a very gradual but progressive
exercise regimen needs to become a daily part of the patient's routine
for a maximal return to health.
Top
|