|
Home
|
|
Symptoms
|
|
Live Discussion
|
|
Diagnosis
|
|
Treatment
|
|
Area Support
|
|
Library
|
|
Research
|
|
Lymelinks
|
|
Contact
|
|
Pets & Lyme
|
|
DONATIONS
|
|
Drug Info
|
|
Medical Dictionary
|
|
Board of Directors
|
 
Click on the graphic to vote for this
site as a Starting Point Hot Site.
|
|
| --
|
|
No Warranties or Representations
Lyme Disease symptoms vary from person to person. (lymes disease lyme's disease lime disease limes disease)
The data and information presented in this web site are presented in good faith and believed to be accurate regarding Lyme disease (commonly misspelled lymes disease lyme's disease lime disease limes disease) and other related diseases. Any and all liability for the content or any omissions including any inaccuracies, errors, or misstatements in such data or information is expressly disclaimed. The web site is compiled for the sole purpose of informing community members of resources and information pertaining to Lyme Borreliosis Disease and its coinfections. Lyme disease symptoms may vary from person to person.
The Canadian Lyme Disease Foundation, Directors and members are not liable for any direct or indirect damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this website.
Consult a qualified Lyme ( Borreliosis ) Disease literate doctor for medical advice if Lyme Disease is suspect to discuss your Lyme Disease Symptoms.
|
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 March; 42(3): 1316–1318.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.3.1316-1318.2004.
First Isolation of Borrelia lusitaniae from a Human Patient
M. Collares-Pereira,1* S. Couceiro,1 I. Franca,2 K. Kurtenbach,3 S. M. Schäfer,3 L. Vitorino,1 L. Gonçalves,1 S. Baptista,1 M. L. Vieira,1 and C. Cunha4
Unidade de Leptospirose e Borreliose de Lyme1 Unidade de Clínica das Doenças Tropicais2 Unidade de Biologia Molecular, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal4 Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, United Kingdom3
*Corresponding author. Mailing address: Unidade de Leptospirose e Borreliose de Lyme, Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira, 96, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal. Phone: (351) 213652600. Fax: (351) 213632105. E-mail: mcp@ihmt.unl.pt.
The present study describes and characterizes the first human isolate of B. lusitaniae and the first human isolate of Borrelia in Portugal. A 46-year-old woman from the Lisbon area in Portugal presented with skin lesions on her left thigh that had persisted for approximately 10 years. These chronic skin lesions were characterized by two ill-defined erythematous macules associated with a local diffuse infiltration of the subcutaneous tissues.
Punch biopsy samples (5 mm3) were taken from the margin of the skin lesion and divided into two parts. One part was inoculated immediately into Barbour-Stoenner-Kelly H medium (Sigma) supplemented with gelatin, pH 7.6, and incubated at 32°C for 4 weeks. Cultures were examined weekly by dark-field microscopy for motile spirochetes. The second half of the skin biopsy sample was washed in physiological saline and then transferred to a dry tube and stored at -30°C until PCR was performed. The patient's blood was collected on the day of the biopsy and again 4 months later, and prepared sera were stored at -20°C.
For comparative phenotypic and genetic purposes, an additional 14 strains were evaluated (Table 1). The human isolate PoHL1 and the six Portuguese tick-derived strains PoTiBG4, PoTiBV6, PoTiBG20, PoTiBL37, PoTiBG86, and PoTiBG163 (1) were from low-passage cultures when analyzed. Whole-cell lysates of the spirochetes were centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 30 min, washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in Tris-hydrochloride buffer, and stored at -20°C.
Genomic DNA from all strains and from the skin biopsy sample was extracted with the QIAamp DNA minikit (Qiagen) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. The tissue fragments were incubated overnight at 56°C in lysis buffer, concentrated by evaporation, and analyzed by PCR. A nested PCR targeting the 5S (rrf)-23S (rrl) intergenic spacer and the gene (ospA) encoding the outer surface protein A of B. burgdorferi sensu lato was performed as described previously (4, 5, 11).
Intergenic spacer amplicons were digested with MseI at 37°C for 2 h. Electrophoresis was carried out on a 16% acrylamide-bisacrylamide gel for 1 h at 120 V, the gels were stained with ethidium bromide, and the amplicons were visualized with UV transillumination.
The ospA gene and the intergenic spacer of PoHL1, the human isolate, were sequenced (3). In addition, spacer amplicons were subjected to DNA-DNA hybridization by the reverse-line blot assay (5, 11).
Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed according to the method of Laemmli (8). The patient's antibodies were detected in a two-step approach: an in-house indirect immunofluorescence assay with a polyvalent conjugate (2), followed by an in-house Western blot (12). Immunoblots were calibrated with the following B. burgdorferi monoclonal antibodies: anti-OspA (O31a), anti-OspB (H6831), antiflagellin (H9724), anti-OspC (CB625), anti-p72 (CB312), and anti-Hsp60 (O62a).
Borrelia was successfully isolated from the skin lesion of the human patient. The sequence of the intergenic spacer sequence of the B. lusitaniae human isolate (strain PoHL1) is shown in Fig. 1.
DNA-DNA hybridization by the reverse line blot assay showed that only the DNA probe specific for B. burgdorferi sensu lato hybridized to the human skin isolate, since no DNA probe specific for B. lusitaniae was available. Phylogenetic analysis of the partial ospA sequence revealed that the patient isolate clustered with B. lusitaniae (Fig. 2). The human isolate had an ospA allele that was not identical to those of previously described tick isolates of B. lusitaniae. A nucleotide similarity of 84.2% to alleles of tick isolates PotiB1, PotiB2, and PotiB3 was observed. At the rrf-rrl locus, the alleles of the human isolate and the B. lusitaniae tick isolate PoTiBL37 differed by only 1 nucleotide, leading to a sequence identity of 99.5%.
The PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism profile resulting from the MseI-digested 230-bp 5S-23S intergenic spacer showed four fragments (78, 69, 39, and 29 bp) for both the human and the tick B. lusitaniae isolates. The observed restriction patterns were indistinguishable from each other but different from those of the other members of the B. burgdorferi sensu lato complex (Fig. 3).
Analysis of the whole-cell lysate protein profile of the human B. lusitaniae isolate with monoclonal antibodies revealed the presence of OspA, OspB, OspC, flagellin, p72, and Hsp60 proteins. The patient's serum specimens were analyzed for antibodies reactive with B. lusitaniae, B. garinii, and B. afzelii by immunoblotting. No immunoglobulin M (IgM) response was detected. However, a weak IgG reaction with proteins p72 and Hsp60 and a protein with a molecular size of approximately 14 kb was observed with the three studied strains. The immunofluorescence assay only showed a slight reactivity (1:32) in the second serum sample.
The results of the molecular analyses of the patient isolate allows the assignment of this strain to B. lusitaniae, a genospecies previously considered to be nonpathogenic in humans. This finding supports our recent genotyping of B. lusitaniae from directly amplified spirochetal DNA from skin biopsy samples from Portuguese patients with suspected Lyme disease. Besides being prevalent in Tunisia, B. lusitaniae is considered to be predominant in the south of Portugal (GrÂndola region), where it is the unique strain isolated so far from I. ricinus ticks or detected by DNA amplification in hard-tick species other than I. ricinus (1, 3). This predominance of B. lusitaniae in southern habitats, as well as its first isolation in a patient living near Lisbon, suggests an important transmission risk for this genospecies in these areas.
In conclusion, for this human case, the described weak serological response, which is present in a high percentage of our patients with unspecific and long-lasting skin manifestations, suggests a clinical pattern for B. lusitaniae different from those for other Borrelia spp. in the Portuguese population examined so far.
TO THE TOP
|
| | |