Lyme disease problem grows in Sussex County
Increase in deer population among factors
Tuesday, January 31,
2006
Star-Ledger Staff
The incidence of Lyme disease in Union County has
grown a disconcerting six-fold in five years. Only two
other New Jersey counties -- Sussex and Passaic -- have
seen higher rates of increase.
Experts attribute the statewide increase to changes in
how the disease is reported and the local increase in the
region's growing deer population, among other
factors. They also point to the disease's spread
throughout the Northeast and into the Midwest and
Southeast.
"It's very clear that it's a growing
trend," said Dr. Raj Kapila, an associate professor
of infectious diseases at the University of Medicine and
Dentistry of New Jersey.
Many New Jersey counties, particularly rural areas like
Hunterdon, Sussex and Warren counties -- with 326, 219 and
135 cases reported in 2004, respectively -- have many more
Lyme disease cases than densely developed Union County.
But the disease's incidence -- the number of cases
per 100,000 people -- is rising in Union County more
rapidly than in other counties, according to the state
health department.
In 2004, about 12 people out of every 100,000 in Union
County contracted Lyme disease, compared to two in 1999,
an increase of 5.5 percent. In Sussex and Passaic counties,
the disease's incidences -- the number of cases per
100,000 people -- rose almost 7 and 15 percent,
respectively, in the same period.
Essex and Monmouth counties also saw increases in that
period, with incidence rising about 3 percent in both
counties. The incidence of Lyme disease in other counties
did not rise significantly over the same period.
The incidence of Lyme disease has increased statewide
due partly to efforts to increased reporting of the
disease, said state health department spokesperson Nathan
Rudy.
In 2000, the standards for reporting a case of Lyme
disease changed, allowing doctors to report cases of
Lyme disease that were confirmed by a laboratory but not
accompanied by the characteristic bull's eye rash,
said Rick Proctor, who serves as health officer for
Hillside, Rahway, Scotch Plains and Winfield and as a
county freeholder.
In 2004, labs testing for Lyme disease were also given
access to the computer system that tracks communicable
diseases, increasing the number of cases that were
reported, Proctor said.
Though these procedural changes account for the
statewide increase, they do not fully account for the
disease's rise within Union County.
Though Lyme disease's toll varies from year to year
as part of its natural cycle, experts also point to
Union County's burgeoning deer population as one
possible reason for the increase.
Ticks carrying the bacteria feed on deer, which serve
as "amplifiers" of the disease, spreading the
ticks through a larger area, said Marc Dolan, senior
research biologist for the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention's division of vector-born infectious
diseases.
Reducing the deer population through measures such as
the hunt begun last weekend in the Ashbrook Reservation
can help reduce the number of people who get Lyme
disease, but will not eliminate or drastically reduce
the disease, Dolan said.
"Getting rid of the deer or getting rid of the
rodent populations is not a viable way to rid the U.S.
of Lyme disease," Dolan said. "We can't
deplete a species. We've got to find another way to
combat it."
Personal protective measures like tucking one's
pants into one's socks and checking one's body
for ticks after outdoor activities, particularly at the
height of tick season from May through July, are the
first line of defense against Lyme disease, said Dolan.
In a back yard, applying pesticides and landscaping to make
it less tick- and deer-friendly can reduce the chance of
Lyme disease.
Scientists have developed various types of "bait
boxes" to apply tick-killing chemicals to rodents and
deer without harming the animals, an approach that has
proved "very effective" but expensive, with a
rodent bait box costing $400 to $500, Dolan said.
A combination of strategies is the best way to reduce
the spread and impact of Lyme disease, Dolan said.
"There's no silver bullet out there for getting
rid of ticks or getting rid of Lyme disease," he
said.
TOP
|